Search for: All records

Abstract Localized tropical rainfall changes commonly occur on 500–1,000 km scales under various climate forcings, but understanding their causality remains challenging. One helpful process‐oriented diagnostic (POD) decomposes the effects of undilute buoyancy and lower free‐tropospheric moisture through a precipitation‐buoyancy relationship, but its applicability at subregional scales is uncertain. We examine month‐to‐month rainfall changes in five South Asian monsoon subregions. The POD accurately characterizes the precipitation‐buoyancy relationship across all subregions and successfully predicts the sign of rainfall changes in four out of five subregions. However, the POD's ability to predict rainfall change magnitudes and identify causal mechanisms varies, providing confident explanations in only two subregions, where lower free‐tropospheric moisture emerges as the dominant driver of change. While these findings demonstrate the POD's utility in specific contexts, they also reveal limitations. We caution against using the POD as a standalone tool at these scales for predicting rainfall changes or decomposing their drivers. 

Abstract Overly smooth topography in general circulation models (GCMs) underestimates the blocking effect of the steep mountain ranges flanking the eastern Pacific. We explore the impact of this bias on common biases in Pacific climate simulation [i.e., the unrealistic cross-equatorial symmetry of near-surface winds, sea surface temperatures (SSTs), and precipitation] through sensitivity experiments with modified Central and/or South American topography in an atmosphere–ocean coupled GCM. Quantifying orographic blocking potential via the Froude number, we determine that an envelope topographic interpolation scheme best captures observed blocking patterns. Implementing envelope topography only in Central America reduced model biases as greater blocking of the trade winds warmed SST and enhanced convergence in the northeastern Pacific. Doing so additionally over the Andes improved the simulation of South Pacific circulation and the South Pacific convergence zone as stronger deflection of the westerlies intensified the South Pacific anticyclone. This mitigated convection biases in the southeast Pacific by increasing subsidence and cooling SST. However, remote impacts of the Andes exacerbated the dry bias in the northeast tropical Pacific, resulting in negligible improvement in the East Pacific double-ITCZ. We find that, due to the significant role of large-scale convergence in driving precipitation patterns, other model biases, such as cloud-radiative biases, may modulate the impact of altering topography. Our results highlight the importance of considering alternate methods for calculating model topographic boundary conditions, though the optimal interpolation scheme will vary with model resolution and the impact of topography on GCM biases can be sensitive to choices made in formulating parameterizations. Significance StatementIn this study, we explore how the mountain ranges spanning Central and South America shape the climate of the Pacific by blocking large-scale midlatitude and tropical winds. We show that the height of these mountains is typically too low in climate models and that elevating them can improve patterns of rainfall, surface ocean temperatures, and near-surface winds in the Pacific. This is important because model biases in the Pacific climate limit their utility for understanding current and future climate variability. Improving the representation of blocking by mountains can thus be a simple method for reducing uncertainties in future climate projections. 

This Review synthesizes progress and outlines a new framework for understanding how land surface hazards interact and propagate as sediment cascades across Earth’s surface, influenced by interactions among the atmosphere, biosphere, hydrosphere, and solid Earth. Recent research highlights a gap in understanding these interactions on human timescales, given rapid climatic change and urban expansion into hazard-prone zones. We review how surface processes such as coseismic landslides and post-fire debris flows form a complex sequence of events that exacerbate hazard susceptibility. Moreover, innovations in modeling, remote sensing, and critical zone science can offer new opportunities for quantifying cascading hazards. Looking forward, societal resilience can increase by transforming our understanding of cascading hazards through advances in integrating data into comprehensive models that link across Earth systems. 

Abstract Most studies projecting human survivability limits to extreme heat with climate change use a 35 °C wet-bulb temperature (T_w) threshold without integrating variations in human physiology. This study applies physiological and biophysical principles for young and older adults, in sun or shade, to improve current estimates of survivability and introduce liveability (maximum safe, sustained activity) under current and future climates. Our physiology-based survival limits show a vast underestimation of risks by the 35 °C T_wmodel in hot-dry conditions. Updated survivability limits correspond to T_w~25.8–34.1 °C (young) and ~21.9–33.7 °C (old)—0.9–13.1 °C lower than T_w = 35 °C. For older female adults, estimates are ~7.2–13.1 °C lower than 35 °C in dry conditions. Liveability declines with sun exposure and humidity, yet most dramatically with age (2.5–3.0 METs lower for older adults). Reductions in safe activity for younger and older adults between the present and future indicate a stronger impact from aging than warming.